I had this once. In the Scruffydragon Forums mostly. |
Being a reviewer is weird now that everybody's a critic. I don't really
honestly expect my opinion will actually sway you against watching an affront
to all that is good like King of Fighters. In a weird way we've come around to admiting that this shit is a
mite bit personal, and that maybe my advise about Terminator Salvation is
pointless if you're, say, a Terminator completist or some kind of Moon
Bloodgood whore.
So the question I'm posing is, Are
we giving points for effort? You see, my sister bought one of those DVD packs
with a dozen lame movies nobody would have bought on their own, full of bad
camera angles and killers who never show
up and those stupid endings where everyone gets killed.
And among these, they put Lurking Evil.
1994? Holy shit, my first guess put this near the 70s! |
Lurking Evil is not like these other films, and I suspect it benefits from
being surrounded by these other terrible films. Who puts a low budget 90s movie
among 0 budget 2k films? Oh, it's not great. However, it is
a movie, which is more more than I can say of many of it's bundle-buddies.
The film starts of with two sisters
having a discussion on what seems
to be some kind of dilapited castle. You
see, one sister, which had a baby recently, really wanted the other one to
carry a gun, while the second one was understandably worried about packing a
piece near a baby.
For you see, these sisters, aren't in castle Fankenstein by accident, but
are instead hiding from some kind of unseen horror. Eventually said horror peeks it's scraggly hands through a barricade
and uses a wire hanger to pull the baby's
crib out to itself. Trust me, a wire hanger is not strong enough to drag an
ANYTHING. My sister leaves her keys in her car a lot, I know what I'm talking
about here.
The Pro-gun sister steps in for the save, but she gets bloodied and dragged
away for her trouble. Hey, I know the topic of guns in America is a divisive
subject, but nobody disagrees that the one advantage they have over knives is
not having to get close enough to your enemies to get folded up like a clean towel.
We get credits, and as you'd expect, there aren't any names you
know in there except HP Lovecraft. Apparently this movie's plot is based by one
of Love-C's short stories. I wouldn't know if this is accurate or now, because
I'm holding on on reading Lovecraft's
collected works . It's on my list, under all the Harry Potter movies, Game of
Thrones seasons 1-2, and Angel Blade Punish.
The we meet our hero, a rough and tumble former criminal accused of a crime
he didn't commit, just as he's coming out of of doing time. He heads to his closest living relative, who
runs the funeral home, and has hidden some drugs and money on corpses
that our hero is to unearth and sell. But unknown to him, some thugs, a
boss, a femme fatale, and a big guy, come immediately after he leaves and force
the funeral home guy to tell them about the drugs.
Let's put this one in the refrigerator I stuff all my other drugs in. |
We also meet the surviving sister from the prologue and some guy who looks
like a young Emile Hamilton from Man of Steel. They talk about their plan to
kill the ominous things by blowing up a church. Both of them, and a pregnant
lady convene in the church, with a reverend who's not fully in favor of
destroying his working place.
I think the pregnant lady is bait, because honestly if she has any other
use here we never see. If I were pregnant in a town full of monsters why...well
it'd probably be too late if even the men are pregnant. But, you know, I'd take
my monster baby and get the hell out.
So the drinking game is you're supposed to take a drink every time the existence of a monster is driving you mad. |
They're mostly done wiring up the place to blow when our hero stumbles upon
their cemetary, trying to find his drugs.
The sister kidnaps him at gun point.
But then the thugs show u, kidnap our hero AND the church crew. All that
they want is to find their drug corpse. Femme Fatale does show an interest in
pregnant lady, asking her who her "gone" baby-daddy was so she could
kill him. However, she seems have some
emmity with the sister.
I just want to lick your baby's feet as he comes out. Is that so bad? |
They finally drag hero out to dig his granma's corpse, which presumably has
the drugs. But then not only does it not have the drugs, but the tomb caves in,
and our hero is carried by the monster,
which is basically the Cryptkeeper from tales from the crypt after staring too much at the sun.
Our hero somewhat or somehow escapes through an inner barricade built to
keep out the monsters, upon which all of them see the monster, so we don't have
to put up with any more minutes of people not believing in a monster the
audience knows is real. The muscle exclains it might be a bear. You know, one of those famous
underground, lanky, furless bears we've all seen on TV documentaries.
However, instead of bailing out on the whole thing, our crime boss thinks
it's a good idea to keep searching for the gold. Muscle gets dragged out of a tinted glass, which, while probably
painful, is a lot classier than getting dragged out of a regular old glass window.
"I'm not a bear, I'ma twink! Learn your gay sub-groups!" |
The explosion crew and hero-man turn
the tide on their captors, and soon have them tied up to the walls. The
reverend tries to bargain with the monster to kill him and not everyone else,
and tells the monster he's gonna get a good parking space in heaven. The
monster tells him God is Satan and rips out his heart.
Tim Burton's Les Miserables. |
Sister goes out to get a gasoline truck, heroman 's distracted by Femme
Fatel long enough for crime boss to get
out, and Emil Hamilton gets killed,
failing to keep Pregnant lady from getting dragged off underground.
Birthmark, or just a bad burn. |
It all comes to a head underground, where the monsters are patiently
waiting to eat pregnant lady's baby as soon as it plops out. There doesn't seem
to be a reason, but I don't see a reason to take the peel off a grape either.
They're the experts on baby eating, I'll defer to their judgement.
Crime boss and Hero fall in, and the monsters are all for eating them now.
Except Hero's related to them somewhat, thorugh his birthmark, a steak shaped
coloration between his shoulder and his arm. He manages to escape by, and you
trust me that no one questions it, lighting an severed arm on fire, and he kind
of brings along the pregnant lady and the sister. Crime boss sees his sought
after drugs and money and gambles to try and stay here.
"I don't know how I knew it was going to work. |
The sister brings with a gas-truck,
and blows the whole damn thing off. All the monsters are killed. The end,
So, you see, maybe in another context, I wouldn't give a crap about some
90s low-budget horror film. Certainly
not enough to write about it. But In the context of this one night, where the
other horror movie I watched was 70% "People talking about dull stuff in
broad daylight" , it is worth considering. Context is everything, and I
can't recommend you watch a shitty movie, just so you can make this shitty
movie look better.
So if you're interested in a movie that has action and monsters, and some
semblance of a plot, Lurking Evil is kind of that, I guess? But there's certainly better movies with
better action and better monsters. So I guess it depends on how much you love
monsters and action vs how much you don't love poor editing, obvious sets, bad
acting and senseless story. Do whatever you want, I'll go watch Pacific Rim
again.
0 comments:
Post a Comment